We apologise that The Focal Therapy Clinic’s site was experiencing some technical difficulties at the start of the week – if any visitors filled out a contact form and have not heard back from us please do get in touch again and we will contact you very shortly.

Benefits

Perry Letcher Active Surveillance to Focal Therapy
“I feel like the luckiest man on the planet[…] I had HIFU with Mr Tim Dudderidge and the rest has been joyful and happy. I do not feel like a cancer sufferer”
Perry Letcher, HIFU Focal Therapy patient with The Focal Therapy Clinic
 
Review all of our Patient Stories 
 
 

HIFU Focal Therapy is a NICE approved treatment for prostate cancer which has undergone numerous clinical trials.

At present the most extensive, evidence-based study on the outcomes of Focal Therapy for prostate cancer is the Multicentre Study of 5-year Outcomes which was published in October 2018 – the key findings of which are outlined below.

A recently published landmark study comparing the outcomes of Focal Therapy and Radical Prostatectomy treatments for prostate cancer is also outlined on this page.

 

 

Clinical Evidence

 

Multicentre Study of 5-year Outcomes Following Focal Therapy

 

In this 10-year clinical trial, conducted between 2006 and 2016 in the UK, 625 men were treated with HIFU Focal Therapy, giving a median follow up of 5 years.

The results of the trial were published in 2018 and showed that the HIFU Focal Therapy is an effective treatment for prostate cancer with a low probability of urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction.

 

Cancer Control

100% cancer-specific survival rate

88% failure-free survival (FFS) rate – defined as freedom from radical or systemic therapy, metastases and cancer-specific mortality.

74% needed no further treatment after their initial Focal Therapy treatment

19% needed at least one additional Focal Therapy treatment

7% required Radical Treatment following Focal Therapy

 

Urinary continence

98% had no issue with urinary continence after the treatment

2% needed pad use for a couple of weeks

 

Sexual potency*

75% had no issues

20% needed ongoing over-the-counter medicine) but may have been using this before treatment

5% needed some ongoing additional support.

*For men with erectile function pre-treatment  

 

Conclusion

The overall conclusion was that HIFU Focal Therapy for select patients with clinically significant, non-metastatic prostate cancer is effective in the medium term and has a low probability of side effects.

(It is important to note that as the study was conducted with a follow up of 5 years it can only include the ‘medium term’ in its conclusion, as long term is defined as a 10 year span.)

This study is the biggest of its kind and demonstrates why Focal Therapy should be part of any treatment consideration for early-stage prostate cancer. 

Download the full report here:

Review our Patient Stories 

 

 

Raj Nigam

Listen to Consultant Urologist Raj Nigam discussing the impact of the landmark 8-year study comparing Focal Therapy to Radical Prostatectomy on clinical practice and patient care – 

“One would hope that with the publicising of this study more men will become aware that there is an equivalent option to radical treatment. If they look into it further, they will see that it is a minimally invasive option in which they are likely to preserve their continence and in which they will have a 15-20% risk of erectile dysfunction vs a 50-70% risk with a radical prostatectomy.”
 

 

 

Focal Therapy Compared to Radical Prostatectomy for Non-metastatic Prostate Cancer

This landmark 8-year study led by Imperial College London and co-authored by TFTC consultant urologists Tim Dudderidge and Raj Nigam, compared the oncological outcomes of 246 Focal Therapy and 246 Radical Prostatectomy patients at 3, 5 and 8 years post treatment. The patients were matched according to their year of surgery, age, PSA, Gleason score, maximum cancer core length, use of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, and T-stage. 

The results of the study, published in 2020, have shown that for patients with low to intermediate prostate cancer, Focal Therapy provides similar cancer control and better post-op function compared to Radical Prostatectomy.

 

Cancer control

The rates of failure-free survival (FFS) – defined as freedom from local salvage therapy or systemic therapy or development of metastases – for the two treatments were as follows:

 

Functional outcomes

The rates of erectile function* and urinary continence post treatment were as follows:

*Erectile function scores include men who did not have erectile function pre-treatment 

 

Conclusion

The key finding of the study was that ‘In patients with non-metastatic low- intermediate prostate cancer, oncological outcomes over 8 years were similar between Focal Therapy and Radical Prostatectomy’.

 

Download the full report here:

 

 

“The side effects of HIFU were nothing major and have now cleared up. It was better than having your teeth out! When I was researching treatment options after my diagnosis there was a lot of bad press and negativity: then I found HIFU and it was so reassuring to know that there was something less scary out there.”

David Allen – The Focal Therapy Clinic, HIFU Patient

Get In Touch

As a group of consultants we are passionate about prostate cancer sufferers knowing about all of their treatment options.

We know that settling on the right treatment is a big decision for you. If you would like to speak to one of our friendly and knowledgeable patient advocates about your diagnosis and the HIFU Focal Therapy treatment option then please do not hesitate to get in touch today.

All enquiries to The Focal Therapy Clinic are confidential, and we are delighted to offer our advice and support with no obligation.