
Am I Suitable for Focal Therapy?
You are likely suitable for focal therapy if your prostate cancer is localised (confined to the prostate), intermediate-risk (Gleason 6–7 / ISUP Grade 1–3), clearly visible on multiparametric MRI, with a PSA typically at or below 20 ng/mL. At The Focal Therapy Clinic, consultant urological surgeons — co-authors of the leading UK focal-therapy evidence — confirm eligibility with MRI and multidisciplinary review before treatment.
In our experience with over 2,000 procedures, men who meet these criteria achieve 97% continence preservation and 90%+ sexual function maintenance (FTC audit, n=265). For treatment details, see our pages on HIFU and NanoKnife.
How Eligibility for Focal Therapy Is Determined
PSA (Prostate-Specific Antigen)
Most focal-therapy candidates have a PSA of 20 ng/mL or below, but PSA alone does not decide eligibility — a PSA slightly above 20 may still qualify if the MRI, biopsy and Gleason findings are favourable. Your consultant weighs all factors together.
- PSA is a blood test used to help assess prostate cancer activity and whether disease appears localised.
- PSA is reviewed alongside MRI findings, biopsy results, and Gleason score to determine suitability.
Gleason Score
Focal therapy is best suited to Gleason 6 (ISUP 1) and Gleason 7 (3+4 or 4+3, ISUP 2–3) cancers. It is generally not recommended for high-grade Gleason 8–10 (ISUP 4–5) disease, which is more aggressive and more likely to have spread.
- The Gleason score measures how aggressive prostate cancer cells appear under a microscope.
- Higher Gleason scores may indicate more aggressive disease that could require whole-gland treatment instead of focal therapy.
Ideal patients for Focal Therapy
Recommendations about eligibility can be discussed with our expert team of consultants
Even if it’s not, they can talk you through your other treatment options so that you can make an informed decision about the next steps in your care.
Patients who are likely to be eligible
- Low-Risk and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer
Patients with a Gleason score of 6 or 7, with grade group 1 to 3 cancers (which indicates less aggressive cancer) are the best candidates. - Tumours Confined to the Prostate
The effectiveness of focal therapy depends on whether the cancer is restricted to one or a few distinct areas within the prostate. - PSA Levels Below a Certain Threshold
Candidates typically have a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 20 ng/mL or lower. - No Evidence of Metastasis
Focal therapy is only suitable for patients whose cancer is localised and has not spread to lymph nodes, bones, or other distant areas. - Patients Seeking a Less Invasive Treatment
Men who prefer to avoid the potential side effects of surgery or whole-gland prostate radiation may find focal therapy a more attractive option.
Patients who may not be eligible
- High-Risk or Aggressive Tumours
Patients with Gleason scores of 8-10, with grade group 4 or 5 cancers, typically have more aggressive cancers that are more likely to recur. - Widespread Cancer in Multiple Extensive Areas of the Prostate
If cancer is spread outside the capsule of the prostate, focal therapy may leave untreated areas, leading to recurrence. - Very High PSA Levels
Patients with PSA levels significantly above 20 ng/mL are more likely to have extensive disease that cannot be effectively treated with focal therapy alone. - Men Who Want a Single Definitive Treatment
Some patients prefer a one-time treatment option that eliminates cancer with minimal risk of recurrence, and also accept the potential side effects of traditional treatment.
Which Focal Therapy is suitable for you?
HIFU (HTG667) suits posterior or lateral tumours; NanoKnife (HTG688) suits anterior tumours or cancer near the urethra or nerves. Compare NanoKnife and HIFU →
For treatment costs, see our fees page.
“Well, if you’re deemed suitable for the procedure, it really is a no-brainer.”
Brian Bishop
The Focal Therapy Clinic patient
Learn more about your medical suitability
Mr Tim Dudderidge, Mr Raj Nigam and Mr Marc Laniado are named co-authors on the leading UK published evidence for focal-therapy outcomes — the 2026 JAMA Oncology salvage-focal-therapy paper, the 2023 Journal of Urology paper on outcomes in men over 70, and the 2022 European Urology UK HEAT study of 1,379 men.
Questions to ask your doctor or nurse
Get Expert Advice & The Latest Research
Subscribe to our newsletter to receive the latest updates, expert insights, and breakthrough research on prostate cancer-delivered straight to your inbox.
Frequently asked questions

At one year after one focal therapy treatment
Of clinically significant cancer is eliminated*
Of men are fully continent*
Of men retain erections*
*Based upon our one-year outcome audit of 265 patients treated at The Focal Therapy Clinic using advanced MRI-ultrasound fusion technology (FTC audit, n=265, Oct 2025).
Over the medium term, published UK research reports 88% failure-free survival at 5 years (Guillaumier et al., 2018, UK n=625) — a study co-authored by our consultants Mr Tim Dudderidge and Mr Raj Nigam. The UK HEAT registry of 1,379 men reports 69% needing no further treatment at seven years (Reddy et al., 2022).
If the cancer is not fully treated or returns (~5–10%), focal therapy can be repeated or followed by surgery or radiotherapy.
Focal therapy is a day-case procedure — see the full recovery pathway for HIFU or NanoKnife.
Focal therapy preserves continence and sexual function far better than whole-gland treatment — see HIFU side effects / NanoKnife side effects.
Sources
Eligibility follows Gleason 6–7 (ISUP 1–3), PSA ≤20 ng/mL, MRI-confirmed localised disease.
Our outcomes (audit, n=265): 97% continence, 90%+ sexual function, 90% cancer-free at 1 year; five-year failure-free survival 88% (Guillaumier et al., Eur Urol 2018, UK n=625 — co-authored by FTC's Mr Dudderidge and Mr Nigam).
FTC-co-authored evidence: Light 2026 JAMA Oncology; Habashy 2023 J Urol; Reddy 2022 European Urology — co-authored by FTC's Mr Dudderidge and Mr Nigam (Light 2026 also Mr Laniado); Ahmed HU 2015 Nature Reviews Urology.
Comparator figures (surgery / radiotherapy ranges) are from published meta-analyses: ProtecT, NEJM 2023; Hopstaken 2022.
Regulatory: NICE HTG667, HTG688 (2023); NG131; EAU 2024.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Get expert advice & the latest prostate cancer research - straight to your inbox.







